Login | Register


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


It is currently Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:07 am




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 92 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

What type fo engine for Book II
Option #1 66%  66%  [ 136 ]
Option #2 21%  21%  [ 43 ]
Option #3 13%  13%  [ 26 ]
Total votes : 205
Author Message
 Post subject: What type of engine for Book II
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 12:41 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 11:31 am
Posts: 3559
Location: The Basilisk's Lair
I wasn't quite ready to do this poll yet, but I figured since the other one was posted, I'd put this one up as well. Okay, so we have this Book I engine. We could do several things for Book II, depending on the party/solo poll...

1) Keep the game solo and keep Book I's engine. We'll just modify it for higher resolutions and new features.

2) Go with a party, but completely overhaul Book I's engine because we can't do party-based gaming on this engine. This would pretty much mean re-writing the engine, but we stay isometric like Book I.

3) Go with a party, but take the engine in a radical new direction: an engine that we have been developing that would be similar to Wizardry 8, with hints of Dungeon Master / Eye of the Beholder.


Last edited by BasiliskWrangler on Wed Apr 23, 2008 5:32 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 12:54 pm 
Senior Steward

Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 6:09 pm
Posts: 94
i voted #2 ( just because of party support, the gfx and everything else, technic wise could stay), but i would LOVE to see an dungeonmaster clone from you, maybe for book3?


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 12:55 pm 
Council Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:20 pm
Posts: 178
I like party based (4ish players) my self. I'm not against the solo style, in fact I find them pretty fun but there is something about playing as a rag tag group of adventures on the road to riches.


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 1:02 pm 
Steward

Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 11:21 pm
Posts: 67
What time is involved with each option? While I want party based, if I had to wait 4 years for a party based Book II but could get a solo Book II in 1 year, then I'd vote for solo. :)


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 1:13 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 11:31 am
Posts: 3559
Location: The Basilisk's Lair
Option #2 would take the longest amount of development simply because it is the least of the developed engines so far. It would almost be like writing a new engine form the ground up.

A very rough version of Option #3 is already running, so that would take less time. We can tweak the engine to handle Option #1 with the least amount of time.


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 1:27 pm 
Senior Steward

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 10:06 pm
Posts: 95
Before I vote, the Option 3.. a Wizardry 8 like... Would that mean we would not be strategically moving/controlling the NPC's? We would just enter combat and then do Character 1: Cast/Fight/Do Nothing, Character 2: Cast/Fight/Do Nothing etc?

If you could archive say a Fallout/Arcanum like party turn based combat, i'd be inclined to like that.


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 1:32 pm 
Steward

Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 11:21 pm
Posts: 67
I'm going to abstain and just vote whatever is best for Basilisk. I don't mind any of the options listed. While I am itching for a good party based game, I'd be happy with another game in the same engine.


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 1:39 pm 
Initiate

Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 1:26 pm
Posts: 10
Location: Moscow, Russia
I say keep isometry. It's one of the features that made me but Eschalon - I like isometric view much more than any other option. As for time it would take to rewrite engine... Well, I prefer to wait for a game of my dreams, than get someting inferior earlier :)


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 1:44 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 11:31 am
Posts: 3559
Location: The Basilisk's Lair
Jaesun:

Well, that's a good question because we don't have combat set up at all yet. I imagine Option #3 to be sort of a phase-type attack where everyone has a default action each combat round, and when you click the combat button, the round is played out according to initiative and everyone's default actions.

For example, you could make the Ranger in your party:
> Always attack what Party Leader is attacking.
> Always attack most powerful creature.
> Always attack creature closest to death.
> Always attack most distant target

Or of course, you could assign a special one-round action such as:
> Special Attack
> Use object
> Cast spell
> Defend self
> Defend party member

Something like this is what I envision.

****Please remember this is very, very early guesses as to how combat might be performed. ****


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 1:50 pm 
Apprentice

Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 9:34 am
Posts: 29
I would say #1 but I'm not sure. I need time to think about it. It would be nice to see a co-op in Book II, but a party based singleplayer in Eschalon, err?

Maybe. But then the fighting system should be replaced with a new one.

What do you think about adding an action points based on speed and/or other statistics?

At the beggining (low speed) - 1 action point, what means 1 move or attack per round. But what when character will have about 5 or 6 APs? It would be too much.

Now, in Book I it works similar but it's based on that how fast will I click on the enemy or how fast will I attack and move back. If succeeded then I can attack and do a step and an slow enemy will only do one thing.

Uh, don't know if this is a good idea.

I hope someone will understand what I mean.

Edit: Hey, but Eschalon in view point other than isometric isn't Eschalon.

It's the same thing they did to Fallout 3 - FPP in Fallout? It's madness.


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 2:08 pm 
Apprentice

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 11:32 am
Posts: 25
Since the game is being marketed as a trilogy, I'd stay away from any drastic changes. At least until the trilogy is over. The current engine is really fantastic. There are so many interesting things that can be added that I don't see any reason to scrap it this early in the trilogy.


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 2:49 pm 
Marshall
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 5:13 am
Posts: 144
I think I would also like to see you finish the trilogy... then you'd be able to go for the drastic changes with a new game.

_________________
What is a man, If his chief good and market of his time Be but to sleep and feed? a beast, no more. Sure, he that made us with such large discourse, Looking before and after, gave us not that capability and god-like reason to fust in us unused.


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 3:37 pm 
Apprentice

Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 9:34 am
Posts: 29
Same for me. After some time of thinking about it I'd better stay with the Book I engine and work it out.

Add higher resolutions, maybe races or multiclassing, new items, et cetera and just don't make Book II a clone of Book I with other story.


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 3:55 pm 
Senior Steward

Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 6:09 pm
Posts: 94
why would it need a complete engine rewrite to allow party members for book1?


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:25 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 11:31 am
Posts: 3559
Location: The Basilisk's Lair
vid: Think of the way Book I handles turns. To deal with a party, we need to change over to a phased, action-point system. Unless the party members are completely autonomous (no one wants that) there has to be a functional way for you to control everyone.

To achieve this, everything but the way we draw the tiles to the screen will have to be replaced. The combat engine needs completely rebuilt from the ground up. The travel and movement system needs replaced. Inventory and character stat management needs drastically updated, etc., etc.


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 92 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: